Roger Clarke's Web-Site
© Xamax Consultancy Pty Ltd, 1995-2021
|Identity Matters||Other Topics||Waltzing Matilda||What's New|
It is an Annex to the article of the above name
Version of 31 August 2021
Roger Clarke **
© Xamax Consultancy Pty Ltd, 2021
Available under an AEShareNet licence or a Creative Commons licence.
This document is at http://www.rogerclarke.com/DV/EC21-Ann3.html
This Annex provides extracts from (EC 2021), interpretive comment, and [ cross-references to the corresponding elements of The 50 Principles inside square-brackets ]
Note that this even these empty provisions may not apply to those Other AI Systems that enjoy an exemption, including by virtue of any of Arts. 2.1(a), 2.1(b), 2.3 and 2.4
The very last Article in the EC Proposal, and hence probably an afterthought, is a requirement of the EC and EU member states to "encourage and facilitate the drawing up of codes of conduct intended to foster the voluntary application to AI systems other than high-risk AI systems of the requirements set out in Title III, Chapter 2" (Art. 69.1).
Very limited public benefit is likely to accrue from the anaemic set of requirements even in respect of that sub-set of 'high-risk AI systems' as are subject to the provisions, or to some of them. It appears unlikely that any value at all would arise from the publication of 'codes' by corporations and industry associations that are voluntary and unenforceable.
It is particularly noteworthy that the EC did not even see fit to draw attention to its own 'Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI' (EC 2019). These were ostensibly developed and published with the declared purpose of being "to promote Trustworthy AI" (p.2) and "articulate a framework for achieving Trustworthy AI based on fundamental rights" (p.6); yet in a mere 2 years they appear to have been relegated to history. The reasonable supposition is that corporate lobbying successfully achieved the massive dilution apparent in the EC Proposal, and this was carried over even as a basis for voluntary, unenforceable and inherently ineffective self-regulation.
This Article is very difficult to interpret as anything other than the cheapest possible form of window-dressing.
Roger Clarke is Principal of Xamax Consultancy Pty Ltd, Canberra. He is also a Visiting Professor in Cyberspace Law & Policy at the University of N.S.W., and a Visiting Professor in the Research School of Computer Science at the Australian National University.
The content and infrastructure for these community service pages are provided by Roger Clarke through his consultancy company, Xamax.
From the site's beginnings in August 1994 until February 2009, the infrastructure was provided by the Australian National University. During that time, the site accumulated close to 30 million hits. It passed 65 million in early 2021.
Sponsored by the Gallery, Bunhybee Grasslands, the extended Clarke Family, Knights of the Spatchcock and their drummer
Xamax Consultancy Pty Ltd
ACN: 002 360 456
78 Sidaway St, Chapman ACT 2611 AUSTRALIA
Tel: +61 2 6288 6916
Created: 14 July 2021 - Last Amended: 31 August 2021 by Roger Clarke - Site Last Verified: 15 February 2009
This document is at www.rogerclarke.com/DV/EC21-Ann3.html