Version of 9 February 2022
During the 2010s, a cluster of organisations conspired to:
Organisations involved included government policy agencies, regulators, and the many kinds of corporations involved in the now broken-up and privatised electricity industry.
That manoeuvre was accompanied by a conspiracy of silence. The industry makes it very difficult for consumers to discover that consumers can create obstacles, and perhaps even prevent, intensive data about themselves being expropriated and exploited.
The elements that make up the scheme are:
The following section provides a brief explanation of what a consumer can do if they have concerns about these data practices.
The last section provides a fuller explanation and access to a few key sources.
Ask your current electricity retailer to replace your current meter with:
A Type 4A / MRAM meter with disabled communications
This is a smart meter, which gathers intensive data just the same, but does not transmit it every hour or day, because the data-transmission component is disabled or removed.
Some retailers might refuse to supply power to premises with a Type 4A meter, so it's necessary to explain clearly when you get quotations that you have that kind of meter.
Some other retailers may have difficulty understanding the request. (The standards of customer support in the industry are not high). In the ACT, for example, it appeared in late 2021 that only 3 retailers were capable of offering a contract, of about 9 active in the jurisdiction.
Make sure that you check whether any fee will be involved. If there will be, ask how much, and under what circumstances the fee does not apply, or will be waived. There appear to be a number of such circumstances. (For example, it seems to be gratis if you need to have a meter replaced, e.g. due to its age, or solar is being installed, and you ask your current retailer).
Installing a Type 4A meter is best done sooner, not later. The edicts, and the practices of the industry, are shifting towards much more intensive data collection, transmission and retention. By installing a meter soon, you will get whatever the current setting is (e.g. 30 minutes). It appears that a change to the far more intrusive intensity of 5-minute intervals, and that this may be imposed, without your consent being sought or needed. After the meter is installed, it appears that the interval is less likely to be changed, at least until the organisation has a need to come out and modify the meter.
This Public Information Paper provides guidance on how to reduce the privacy-invasiveness of smart meters. The situation varies across States and Territories, and to some extent depending on the distributor (the 'posts and wires' company) and the retailer (who you pay for your electricity). As a result, this document may contain some imprecise statements about your own particular situation.
Please let us know of any experiences you have that are different from what is described here, and of any additional useful sources of information you find on the topic.
Each household that is connected to the electricity grid is charged for the electricity that it uses. This may be measured using an old 'analogue' meter or a more recent 'electronic' or 'digital' meter. In both cases, the data that is extracted is the total usage over a long period (usually a quarter or a month), possibly in several sub-totals based on the time-of-day. This data is necessary, relevant, and not very privacy-sensitive.
In recent years, edicts have been issued by governments declaring that:
Smart meters have two key features:
This creates new security risks, because:
As a result, some consumers are justifiably concerned about the privacy impacts of smart meters.
Proponents of smart meters claim that smart meters are of benefit to consumers. For a small proportion of people, this may be true. However, it only applies to those consumers who have all of the following:
For most consumers, on the other hand, smart meters are of no value.
The primary purpose of smart meters is savings for the electricity industry in relation to the labour costs associated with reading meters. In principle, that's generally a good thing, although the extent to which some of the savings may be passed on to consumers depends on a few factors.
Other benefits to the industry might arise, such as the detection of segments of the network that require repair or enhancement. That, too, is clearly a good thing. It could be achieved far more efficiently, however, by installing far smaller numbers of meters further up the network, such as at suburban transformers.
There are also potential benefits for organisations if they can make use of the data for additional purposes. Those organisations may include a range of corporations in the power industry, corporations in other industries, particularly consumer marketing; and they may also include government agencies concerned variously with data collection (e.g. ABS), economics, public policy, and law enforcement. This is a further important reason why some people have privacy concerns about smart meters.
An indication of how many categories of organisations get access to the data is in the Appendix below.
Government edicts make it very challenging for consumers to protect their security and privacy. In particular, when a change in meter is required, there is no legal way to avoid a smart meter being installed (apart from going off-grid).
However, there is a craftily-hidden - but possibly not cheap - way to reduce the negative impacts on your security and privacy. It is possible to have a neutered smart-meter installed. By this is meant a Type 4A smart meter, which is one whose data transmission capability has been removed or disabled.
A meter-reader needs to come around periodically (preferably annually, to reduce the cost, but many retailers seem insist on doing quarterly reads), and retailers may charge the householder for each meter-read. In the ACT, one experience was that only 3 / 9 retailers said they could provide power to premises with a Type 4A meter. Of those, 1 (Red) wanted to charge over $600 p.a. for manual reads, whereas the other 2 were vague about whether they would charge or not. The old provider (Actew) did not charge for the one read that was done, and the new provider (Origin) did not charge at least for the first two reads.
For the means whereby a consumer can reduce the privacy-invasiveness of smart meters, see above.
The details are difficult to discover. Electricity distributors (who run the network) pretend not to know anything about it. Most electricity retailers (who you pay for your electricity) pretend not to know anything about it (or fail to include the information in the training they provided to their call-centre staff). Most electricians, even including the ones who install solar panels, don't seem to know anything about it.
There's a mention halfway through a long page on Smart Meters at the web-site of the Australian Energy Regulator (AER):
Retailers are required to install smart meters for new connections (eg. a new build house) and if your meter is faulty or has reached the end of its life and needs replacing. If your meter needs replacing, you can ask your retailer to disable the communications functions. There may be additional costs associated with the retailer having to do manual reads of your meter if you choose to have the telecommunications disabled.
A meter of this kind is called an MRAM or a Type 4A. We've been unable to find out what 'MRAM' stands for. However, a Type 5 meter is an MRIM, which stands 'Manually Read Interval Meter', so MRAM may mean 'Manually Read Automated Meter'. You may be able to find more information by searching on relevant web-sites.
Here is some information from the Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC):
"A type 4 meter is a two-way digital communication system that automatically sends a customer's usage data to the required parties through its remote communications function. This automated communication ends the need for manual meter reads and gives customers greater control over their electricity usage and billing arrangements, and a choice of services. [ The claim in the italicised clause is contentious. ]
"A type 4A meter is a meter that is capable of providing the services ... but has its communications deactivated and therefore cannot be remotely read and/or managed. ... a type 4A meter can be installed in place of a type 4 meter in certain circumstances.
"A metering coordinator can install a type 4A meter where ... :
Similar information is on the web-site of the Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO), in its 'Metering Exemption Guideline'.
Some suppliers also include statements, e.g. for regional Queensland:
"2. Can I opt out of a new Type 4 digital meter?
"A customer can refuse to have a Type 4 digital meter, in which case, the new digital meter will still be installed, but the communications capability is not installed. This meter is known as a Type 4A. Type 4A meters are not recommended as many of the customer benefits of having a digital meter are lost". [ Again, the claim in the italicised clause is contentious, because for the large majority of consumers, the only 'benefit' is avoiding the risk of having to pay an additional amount for manual reads. ]
It appears from an article on a protest site that the opportunity to install Type 4A meters was only won in early 2019.
It is far from easy to find out what categories of organisation exist, and what access each has to the data. A small degree of insight into the many categories in the splintered electricity industry is provided by the (huge) National Energy Regulations. Relevantly, in s.7.10 c. pp.1073-1085, mention is made of 'metering data providers' and of a 'metering data services database' that stores the massive amount of intensive household data for 7 years.
Categories of organisation that have access to the database, mentioned in s.7.15.5, include 'registered participants'. There are a great many of these, and they take 25 pp. to define (s.2, c. pp.10-35). Some organisations of relevance appear to be 'retailer', 'local retailer', 'market small generation aggregator', 'metering provider', 'metering coordinator', 'distribution network service provider', 'network provider', 'network manager', the regulator AEMO, and its agents and any regional regulators, and the energy ombudsman. So the number of points of data-exposure is very large.